This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
- From: Scott_Boag at lotus dot com
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:22:04 -0500
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com> wrote:
> format-number() is another case in point of this. It
> causes *real* pain when an implementor has to find away to implement such
an
> awkward mechanism when his language has perfectly useful, and far more
mature,
> numerical formatting constructs.
Yes, I very much agree, format-number, in retrospect, was a mistake.
> It *appears*, and I might be wrong, that this XSLT 1.1 draft
> was produced without thinking of the general ramifications of the changes
> outside of the Java interest.
Please note that Microsoft is very much a part of the XSL WG.
-scott
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list