RE: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template)

["Michael Kay" <mhkay at iclway dot co dot uk>]

> I must admit to being completely confused by XQuery. It seems like
> reinventing XSLT but without XML syntax for programming constructs
> (admittedly a fair step to take). I thought that it might be that
> XQueries are for building XML from things other than XML, but the
> XPath-like syntax seems to imply that the source (e.g. database) is
> accessed as a node tree anyway. I feel sure that I must be missing
> something.

I think XQuery and XSLT/XPath are on convergent paths: they are tackling the
same problems, and if each follows its natural course they will end up with
broadly equivalent functionality. But they are coming from different
traditions, and as a result they currently have different strengths and
weaknesses, as well as different syntactic appearance.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list