This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1
- From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce at clarkevans dot com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:18:12 -0500 (EST)
- cc: script Petitioners <no-xsl-script at clarkevans dot com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I'd like to point out, and possibly repair a factoid bug
in the petition.
> 7. With the new extension function language binding clauses
> and recent changes to the DOM specification, it appears that
> the W3C strongly favors Java and Javascript over other
> equally qualified languages. We would prefer language
> neutrality.
In particular, the DOM specification had Java and ECMA Script
bindings in the first version. Thus "recent changes" above
is incorrect, this unfortunately (my fault) was not fixed
ealier. IMHO, the above paragraph should read:
> 7. With the new extension function language binding in XSLT 1.1
> draft and the Java and ECMA binding appendix of the DOM
> specification, it appears that the W3C strongly favors Java and
> Javascript over other equally qualified languages. We would prefer
> language neutrality.
Very sorry,
Clark
P.S. Uche, can we have a 'known bugs' section? *sigh*
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list