This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indirection
- To: "Clark C. Evans" <cce at clarkevans dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indirection
- From: Jeni Tennison <mail at jenitennison dot com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:19:58 +0000
- CC: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103021926410.24146-100000@clarkevans.com>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi Clark,
> Where in the xsl:script spec is a URI provided to identify the
> functionality described? There is a prefix, and this is not a global
> URI. Also there is a "src", and this is not a language independent
> URI and must be missing when the script code is included in the
> stylesheet. So, What am I missing? Where is this
> implementation-independent-uri in the 1.1 Draft?
I think that the namespace URI referred to by the implements-prefix
attribute is the implementation independent URI. Several xsl:script
elements can share the same prefix/URI but have different languages.
Presumably the namespace URI referred to by the implements-prefix
attribute would resolve to an implementation-independent functional
description of the functions in that module/namespace in the same way
that the namespace URI used for a particular XML vocabulary would
resolve to some kind of description of the vocabulary (i.e. you might
get something human-readable, you might get something
machine-readable, you might not get anything at all).
Cheers,
Jeni
---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list