This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indirection
- To: "'xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of indirection
- From: "Kaganovich, Yevgeniy (Eugene)" <ykaganovich at netfish dot com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:27:29 -0800
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
What if xsl:script were changed from...
:
: > <xsl:script implements-prefix="date"
: > language="lang:yyyy"
: >
: src="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extension/impl/dates.xyz"/>
:
: To...
:
: <xsl:script implements="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extensions"
: language="lang:yyyy"
:
: src="http://datestuff.com/xslt/extensions/impl/dates.xyz"/>
I find the XSLT namespace usage for bindings somewhat problemmatic. I think
Clark made an argument earlier that these bindings could be used for other
languages, not just XSLT, which I found convincing. Given that we can always
include top-level elements in XSLT stylesheets if we really need it to be
part of XSLT document, it seems better to have a separate namespace.
- Eugene
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list