This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: implements-prefix vs implements-namespace
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: RE: [xsl] implements-prefix vs implements-namespace
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:56:09 -0000
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> From: Jeni Tennison
> The only time when any level of complexity is introduced is if you
> have a clash between the namespace prefixes you're using in your
> stylesheet and those that were used in the imported stylesheet. The
> namespace mappings give you the flexibility to introduce a different
> prefix for the same namespace and use that prefix in your stylesheet.
> Or you can change one of the other mappings in your stylesheet to get
> rid of the conflict - it's up to you. Within the one stylesheet, only
> one mapping is visible.
Scenario.
I've created a stylsheet from some other source, which has the
correct xsl namespace, but uses out: as prefix.
If I import/include this into a main stylesheet which uses xsl: as the
prefix, what happens?
Regards DaveP
(unlike Mr C, a recent exposee to ns hickups).
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list