This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Re[2]: xsl 1.1 security model?
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: Re[2]: [xsl] xsl 1.1 security model?
- From: "Chris Bayes" <Chris at Bayes dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:25:20 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> I think the best approach to this would be to change HTML to support
> frame-sets which include HTML code rather than just references to
> other HTML documents. Of course, this is simply to keep the entire
> page generated in a single XSLT tansform.
>
> An approach which works today is to have a frame set, and then each of
> the HTML "pages" referenced in that frame set would be XSLT transforms
> for each of the frames. No need for xsl:document at all.
I don't follow that but trying to get my head round it made me think of
<xsl:target name="_top"... as opposed to or as well as <xsl:document
href="_top"... or maybe <xsl:document href="browser://_top"...
Sure would save a lot of typing.
I don't see the problem anyway. Has anyone played with xml.save() or
xmlhttp.open()/send() recently?
Ciao Chris
XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list