This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL Namespaces - confused
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
- From: "Ralof" <ralof at gellivare dot se>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:55:21 +0200
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I see, thanx for the link BTW.
In all examples and recommendations (well not all, but most of them)
they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but
that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those
recomendations all dated, or is there any good reason for using that
instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ?
I have tried to search, but english is not my native language, so
I have problem putting together good queries.
Ralof wrote:
> Now, why? :)
>
> XSL Processor
> Vendor: Microsoft
> Processor version: Original IE5 (or old version of other processor)
You answered your own question.
Please read the MSXML XSLT FAQ at http://www.netcrucible.com/
- Mike
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list