This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
From: Goetz Bock <bock at blacknet dot de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:02:32 +0200
References: <20010619143502.17251.qmail@web3603.mail.yahoo.com> <000c01c0f8d0$7a391060$1201a8c0@fuseboxk1>
Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com


On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote:
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
> 
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows.
 
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for
Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these
special cases)

    Goetz.

PGP signature

References:
- Xalan and ApacheServer Win32
  - From: Loren Lai
- Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
  - From: kfricovsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]