This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: XSLT WG: What is planned for XSLT 2.0 - Questions!


I know nothing about what's going to be in version 2.0. I've not used any
extensions nor the xsl:script. I basically wrote xslt code, lurked on the
xsl-list,
and looked through http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect2/sect21.html.

Richard


Patrick Moore wrote:

> Here you go,
>
> 1. Is there going to be a XPath function that gives a node set of the
> distinct keys?
> 2. Can you define keys that use a set of nodes defined by a primary key as
> the starting point?
>    ex. To organize States and then the Cities with in the states.
>   <key name="StateKey" match="State" use="Name" >
>       <key name="CityByState" match="key('StateKey') match="City" use="Name"
> />
>   </key>
> 3. Which of the several things listed in the http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req
> have been discarded as possible solutions to the grouping issues?
>
> 4. What problem is xsl:script supposed to solve?
>
> 5. "pure" xslt extensions? how are they going to work?
>
> 6. considering the talk and work (xsltc) on having xslt on "small" devices
> are there any features that will be considered optional to allow for a
> smaller footprint?
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Patrick Moore [mailto:patrickm@rioport.com]
> >Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:03 PM
> >To: 'xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com'
> >Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT WG: What is planned for XSLT 2.0
> >
> >
> >Which as Chris has pointed out is an ancient 6 months-old
> >document.... Would
> >be nice to have more current information. Especially since I
> >suspect that
> >grouping will be massively changed and that is a big part of
> >the things done
> >in XSL now a days... at least judging by this mailing list and that
> >document..
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: David_Marston@lotus.com [mailto:David_Marston@lotus.com]
> >>Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:36 AM
> >>To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> >>Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT WG: What is planned for XSLT 2.0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Pat Moore asks:
> >>>I am doing a presentation on XSLT and I was wondering what is on the
> >>>short list of things planned for XSLT 2.0.
> >>
> >>The official answer is in this planning document:
> >>http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req
> >>.................David Marston
> >>
> >>
> >> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >>
> >
> > XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]