This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSL Standards?
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL Standards?
- From: Francis Norton <francis at redrice dot com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:36:57 +0100
- References: <003201c14acc$4a6632c0$0100007f@PCUKMKA>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Michael Kay wrote:
>
> I think it was just priorities, coupled with insufficient experience in the
> early days of actual user requirements. Extension functions were thought to
> be needed primarily for access to external resources, and to algorithms (e.g
> regexp) which no one would dream of coding in XSLT. Of course that changed
> over time and the requirement to write extension functions in XSLT is now in
> the published XSLT 2.0 requirements.
>
Thanks - sorry for the extended moan!
Francis.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list