Re: [xsl] Comparision of parsers

["cutlass" <cutlass at secure0 dot com>]

2 cents worth.

as a rule of thumb xslt processor speeds are somewhat directly related to
the underlying xml parser;

a c++ sax parser is faster then
a java sax parser is faster then
a c++ dom implementation is faster then
a java dom parser


cheers, jim fuller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@bayes.co.uk>
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: [xsl] Comparision of parsers


> http://www.datapower.com/XSLTMark/
>
> Ciao Chris
>
> XML/XSL Portal
> http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com] On Behalf Of
> > Mailer Mailer
> > Sent: 08 October 2001 14:32
> > To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> > Subject: [xsl] Comparision of parsers
> >
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I want a comparision list of most of the available
> > xslt processors like XALAN, XT etc.
> > If someone has done the benchmark of this please pass
> > me this information.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Deep
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting,
> > just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
> >
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list