This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Comparision of parsers

To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparision of parsers
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:29:31 +0100
References: <000401c15007$fe41c1c0$2100a8c0@swiftnet.tec><035401c1500b$59434e10$9e01a8c0@ROSEBUD>
Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

cutlass writes:
 > as a rule of thumb xslt processor speeds are somewhat directly related to
 > the underlying xml parser;

speed of what? if the stylesheet visits every node of the document at
random, I would guess that whether the parser was DOM- or SAX-based is
irrelevant

Sebastian

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- RE: Comparision of parsers
  - From: Chris Bayes
- Re: Comparision of parsers
  - From: cutlass

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]