This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
positional predicates in XPath vs XQL
- From: "Howard Katz" <howardk at fatdog dot com>
- To: <XSL-List at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:35:59 -0800
- Subject: [xsl] positional predicates in XPath vs XQL
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I'm implementing an engine that evaluates XPath. I'm currently working on
the part of the engine that implements positional predicates. I've
previously worked this out for location paths in XQL, but I think the
semantics are different in the two languages and want to make sure I
understand the differences.
In XQL if you say (pretending for the moment that positions start from 1 as
they do in XPath, rather than 0):
/section/para[ 1 ]
and you have a tree that looks like this:
1 section
2 para
3 para
4 section
5 para
6 section
7 para
8 para
9 para
you'll get back this nodeset:
<2>, <5>, <7>
You can paraphrase this XQL query as saying, "Give me back the 1st child
node of each <section> element." Similarly, "/section/para[ 2 ]" returns
<3>, <8>, and if you say "/section/para[ 3 ]", you get back the single node,
<9>.
To my understanding, the same location path in XPath only returns a single
node, <2>. Is my understanding correct?
Howard
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list