This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
- From: "Evan Lenz" <elenz at xyzfind dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Cc: <nicmila at idoox dot com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:39:51 -0800
- Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re: RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I may have misunderstood his proposal, however I'm tripped up by the
following example, in which there are no <xsl:param/> elements:
<xsl:template match="*" mode="xxx">
<xsl:apply-templates>
<xsl:propagate-param/>
<xsl:with-param name="c">XXXXXXXX</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:template>
Miloslav, are you listening? What did you mean anyway? :) Is it just syntax
sugar or did you want implicit parameters?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2001JanMar/0132.html
Evan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Gunther
> Schadow
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: Assignment no, dynamic scoping si (was: Re:
> RE: Wishes for XSL revisions ...
>
>
> Thanks for the lead, Evan.
>
> Evan Lenz wrote:
> > Although the XSL WG hasn't discussed this issue as such, there was a
> > proposal[1] (on the ides of March) which asked for much the
> same thing that
> > you want. I think. It's framed as "syntax sugar", but it's
> obviously more
> > than that. Can you tell me how close this proposal is to what you're
> > proposing (modulo syntax)? (See below.)
>
> Miloslav's proposal appears to be different. I'm not sure
> I interpret it right, but it seems he basically wants the
> <propagate-params/> element as an abbreviation of the
> multiple <with-param ...> elements in the apply/call
> template(s) element.
>
> While Miloslav's proposal may arise from a very similar
> motivation as mine, it appears to still rely on explicit
> parameters and on an uninterrupted chain of explicit
> parameter passing. The idea with implicit parameters is
> that they are "passed through" intermediary calls that
> have no interest in these parameters.
>
> regards
> -Gunther
>
>
> --
> Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow@regenstrief.org
> Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
> Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
> tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list