This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Higher-order function support as means to reduce the "standard" operators/functions. (Was(Re: Re: . in for))


> Based on my brief example it is clear, that the standard
> language can be kept small,
> allowing at the same time any desired functionality to be
> easily implemented by
> programmers, based on higher-order function support.
>
Let me say that I agree with you entirely on this. I wish I could convince
my colleagues.

There are complexities, I'm sure, in extending the type system to handle
higher-order functions. But I'm sure that given a will, these could be
resolved.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]