This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: XPath 2.0

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni at jenitennison dot com>
To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:44:34 +0000
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 2.0
Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201081621580.3295-100000@mail.idoox.com><14113160796.20020108160321@jenitennison.com><200201081623.QAA07416@penguin.nag.co.uk>
Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

David C. wrote:
>> I might be reading it wrong, but I think that the << operator is
>> supposed to cover the combination of ancestor and preceding axes.
>> So if you did:
>
> more than that I think: document order orders nodes across documents
> (in an implementation way) whereas nodes in different documents are
> not comparable with orderings based on an axes.

Coo.

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

References:
- XPath 2.0
  - From: Miloslav Nic
- Re: XPath 2.0
  - From: Jeni Tennison
- Re: XPath 2.0
  - From: David Carlisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]