This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XPath 2.0
- From: "Evan D. Lenz" <elenz at xyzfind dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 10:49:40 -0800
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XPath 2.0
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Michael Kay wrote:
> I must say my personal preference is for "<<", simply on the
> grounds that it
> means exactly one of the conditions a<<b, a==b, and a>>b will be true
> (assuming a and b are single nodes)
Does anyone on this list care that "<<", when used in XSLT, would have to be
written as "a<<b"?
Evan
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list