This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: mapping (Was: Re: Re: . in for)
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:38:23 GMT
- Subject: Re: mapping (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)
- References: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700FE7A9DD@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> which maps function A
> Like this more and more!
but you can't do this unless the data model allows functions.
This is what you'd expect in most languages that have sequences and
mapping operators. lisp, ML, Haskel, .... But currently not in
XSLT.
I think functions should be allowed as objects on the datamodel but I
think the WGs still need a bit more convincing....
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list