This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: evaluate() function in XPath 2.0 (Was: Re: Lookup (?))
- From: Oleg Tkachenko <olegt at multiconn dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:23:52 +0200
- Subject: Re: evaluate() function in XPath 2.0 (Was: Re: [xsl] Lookup (?))
- Organization: Multiconn International
- References: <E16crud-000ILQ-00@oceanus.uk.clara.net>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Curtis Burisch wrote:
> Well said! However, I'm going to play the devil's advocate here. Would
> an 'evaluate' function have different capabilities depending on how it
> was implemented? Or would each implementation have the same feature-set?
> What I am driving at is that it is possible that by standardizing the
> evaluate function, creativity and innovation may be stifled; however,
> if they will all do pretty much the same thing, just in a different way
> and with different syntax, then I'm all for standardizing it.
It's a job for exslt effort, I think.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
Multiconn International, Israel
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list