This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: a simple case study
- From: Robert Koberg <rob at koberg dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:25:54 -0700
- Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study
- References: <a0510030db8ede747c110@[192.168.254.19]>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi,
Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:
>>Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:55:08 -0600
>>From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
>>To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
>>Subject: Re: content management stuff - was -> Re: [xsl] a simple case study
>>Reply-To: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
>>
>>>>Yes, this is true. Although it is voluntery to subscribe to this or any
>>>>other list... so the volume is not a prob, as far as I can see. But about
>>>>
>>It's a problem if you care about alienating people who might be valuable
>>contributors to the discussion. One of the people I know who refuses to
>>subscribe is Uche Ogbuji, whose name may be known to many of you. FWIW.
>>
Is the problem more that there are alot of on-topic, but very basic
questions that can (should...) found in FAQs or books?
This list has not been plagued at with off-topic subjects like many
other lists. Just look at how the list administrator is actively
monitoring this thread. It shows a great deal of concern for off-topic
threads. It also shows he has not made up his mind whether this is
off-topic.
Content management affects many (most?) of us directly. I wonder how
many people are rolling their own systems to fit their particular XSL(t)
needs?? It seems to me that the two go hand in hand.
best,
-Rob
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list