This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XSLT 2.0 format-number() question
- From: Mike Brown <mike at skew dot org>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:23:10 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 format-number() question
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Michael Kay wrote:
> The standard conversion rules for passing arguments to functions in
> XPath 2.0 are documented in the XPath 2.0 specification
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/) section 2.2.4. I suspect there are bugs
> in the current description of these rules, but the general principles
> are sound. I think the XSLT spec probably shouldn't say anything about
> the conversions that are applied, this is entirely an XPath matter.
Right, but I still think the first sentence you wrote, above, or even just a
mention that XPath 2.0 is the place to look, would be better than "the
standard conversion rules". There doesn't seem to be any drawback to being
just slightly more specific.
- Mike
____________________________________________________________________________
mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/
denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list