This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: generalized unique element
- From: "Laura Jenkins" <xsl_list at hotmail dot com>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:13:28 +0000
- Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
sorry to post this again..
its a bit not clear for me how to sort this out..
if i have to put a condition that name of the current element(any element)
is not the same of any of the preceding elements ..how do i proceed
further..
i cant get my heads on this..
tried doing something like..
<xsl:if test="not(name(.) = preceding::node()/name())">
I am sure the above line is a mistake.But thaz close to what i think should
happen..
Shall be thankful if someone can get me out of the problem.
From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Reply-To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] generalized unique element
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:08:34 +0100
> I thot of Muenchen way , but i stood back becase it requires to know the
> name of the element that has to be unique..
no it doesn't. You just need a key that matches "*" and uses a key value
of "name(.)"
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list