This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: doe alternative?
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:53:06 +0100
- Subject: RE: [xsl] doe alternative?
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Mike Kay said:
> Since XML comments can't contain elements (only text that looks like
> elements), you wouldn't expect the XSLT result tree to allow a comment
> node to contain an element node, would you?
Pragmatically? Yes.
As XML? No. that's reasonable.
My intent is that a human could remove the comments to 'reveal' valid
XML if necessary.
Hence what I describe as elements, I should now describe as plain text
containing pointy brackets :-)
Thanks Mike, David.
Regards DaveP
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list