multi-insn expansions for macro insns?

[Greg McGary]

Doug Evans <dje@transmeta.com> writes:

> On the other hand, simple expansions are completely reasonable IMO.
> ...
>  >     (sequence () (emit ...) (emit ...))
> 
> That's the plan.  Note that the intent here is to also allow
> specification of runtime determination of what gets emitted.
> e.g. (sequence () (if (foo) (emit this) (emit that)))

Cool.  If no one else is actively working on this, I'll proceed.