This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: RFD: Include an easy editor in the cygwin-standard-distribution
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:34:47 -0400, you wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 07:29:25AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> The best I have found till now is ee, the little brother of aee;
>>Hmm... I agree with your reasoning, but maybe not the package. Let's discuss
>>the highlights of a/ee. I noticed that it's function key based which means I
>>have to move my hands from the keyboard, ugh.
The main point for me is the ease of use. If you hit escape, a menu
pops up which gives you options like save file exit and so on.
No need to learn things like ESC : wg or CTRL S CTRL Q
I did think about something that is self documenting, something like
notepad for cygwin. Perhaps I am completely wrong about the average
user-skill's of cygwin-users but here in germany cygwin is distributed
on CD in a beginner's journal on linux. Not only pro's will be using
it in the future.
>>I suggest, the ed package for one, and if there is a small version of vi, not
>>vim, we include those. Anyone know of a vi package that is close the the
>>original UNIX versions?
Hmmm.. my personal vote would be vim, perhaps it is not always pure vi
but the best version of vi I ever used. (And I'm using it every day)
>Why not use vim? I'm willing to include this. I just need a maintainer.
If it must be vim we could use Chuck Wilson's version because it is
very independant of other packages; I would personally prefer the full
version with gnome support but that can always be distributed as an
addon to cygwin.
I can take care for vim if noone has objections, but I would still
like to raise the question again:
Do we really want that? For me and lot's of others vi is it, but what
about someone getting his feet wet with cygwin for the first time?
Editing a file (or explaining how to) can get complicated with vim or
emacs; why make it more complicated than neccessary?