This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: I *do* want to fix gcc/binutils
- To: cygwin-apps at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: I *do* want to fix gcc/binutils
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:33:30 -0400
- Cc: rdparker at butlermfg dot com, cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu
- References: <20000613200658.A19673@cygnus.com> <20000613215310.A17725@cygnus.com>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 09:53:10PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 08:06:58PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>>I'm downloading the gcc/binutils sources right now (for some reason it
>>is taking forever). I was planning on applying Ron and Chuck's patches
>>and trying to track down the _impure_ptr problem. I refreshed my memory
>>on the problem with some email from Mumit.
>>Ron, you were possibly going to upload a new version of gcc tonight,
>>right? It doesn't fix the -mno-cygwin problem does it? Is anyone else
>I think I've tracked down the problem and it seems to have a simple fix.
>I'd be happy to provide the patch to anyone who has this stuff ready
>In the meantime, I'll start a build going and go play Word Racer on
The build didn't succeed. It stalled on building libobjc. It
progressed far enough for me to test the version of gcc that I built.
That didn't work either. It complained about various undefined symbols
Maybe this is a result of plugging in a recent libiberty.
Oh, and, of course, I'm cross building this on linux like I do all
of my other net packages. I guess tomorrow I can try three-staging
this to see if that works better. It might be a good idea to the
same version of gcc that we release to build our packages anyway.