This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
I've carried on and tested the CVS automake on by openBSD box, to
see if the issues were cygwin-specific, or broken in automake CVS.
on openBSD, only the subdirbuiltsources.test PASSed of the 3 I reported
as failing on cygwin. So I suspect that pr19 & 87 are broken across the
Your patch for pr19.test didn't fix it on my machine either :[.
I haven't looked into your just amiled patch, but I have found why the
subdirbuiltsources.test fails for me - GCC is being called as
gcc -g -O2 -c -o foo.o foo.c
gcc -I. -g -O2 -c -o foo.o foo.c
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <email@example.com>
To: "edward" <tailbert@Yahoo.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
> Thanks edward,
> when I started looking into those, I read somewhere in the
> pages, that the XFAIL results, are "expected fails", so only the
> FAIL: pr87.test
> FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test
> Still need to be looked at. Sorry for the slight misdirection.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "edward" <tailbert@Yahoo.com>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Cc: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
> SNIP> > and had the following tests fail:
> > > XFAIL: cond3.test
> > cond3.test fails for three reasons.
> > > FAIL: pr19.test
> > pr19.test fails for two reasons.
> > > FAIL: pr87.test
> > > FAIL: subdirbuiltsources.test
> > > XFAIL: yaccvpath.test
> > I haven't looked at those yet.