This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFD] ncurses update

Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:48:05PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:03:16PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>>This is an ABI change, requiring the DLL number to be bumped, and apps 
>>>>to be recompiled. (e.g. we now have cygncurses6.dll, etc)
>>>Somehow I don't like the `6' here for a ncurses-5.2 version but
>>>if we can't avoid that...
>>Well, remember that library version != package version, esp. according 
>>to the libtool guys.  It's only a misunderstanding of this 
> Oerks, it's ok.  I shouldn't have complained...

Yeah, but now my reasoning is in the archives, I can point people to 
msgXXXXX when questions (inevitably) arise.

>>>>b) the new libncurses5 package?  (should I just put the old DLLs inside 
>>>>ncurses-5.2-6 package?  should the new DLL's themselves be split from 
>>>>the ncurses package and put in libncurses6 package?)  What about the 
>>>>source code naming difference (libncurses5 != ncurses)?
>>>Splitting is ok but what about just naming the file `ncurses5-5.2-1'?
>>>The package would be nearer to the other ncurses package in setup's
>>>package dialog.
>>No objections here -- but Red Hat doesn't do it that way (nor does any 
>>other RPM-based distro).  Don't we want to be like Red Hat?

Also, then you'd have "ncurses5" and "ncurses6" -- which contain just 
the dll's, along with "ncurses" which contains the executables and man 
pages.  That just doesn't seem to make much sense to me.

libncursesX + ncurses makes more sense, IMO.  (Besides, once categories 
are working, these will all be grouped in some "system libraries" 
category which is a much smaller list than the full list of pacakges...)

> I can't see a reason to follow like sheeps.  We have our own
> packaging scheme which we decide about.  Each Linux distro
> uses a different layout and we don't even have a Linux distro...


I'm thinking of the following (Chris, will the setup.ini generator 
script be able to figure this out?:)


libncurses5-5.2-1-src.tar.bz2 just contains a single file:
which sez "go get ncurses-5.2-5-src.tar.gz"

libncurses6-5.2-1-src.tar.bz2 just contains a single file:
which sez "go get ncurses-5.2-6-src.tar.bz2"

I want to put the lib* versions into subdirs of ncurses, because they 
come from the same "true" source.  However, terminfo is an actual fork, 
so it gets its own toplevel dir.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]