This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Patch] setup.exe - no skip/keep option buggyness
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot Com
- Subject: Re: [Patch] setup.exe - no skip/keep option buggyness
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:44:42 -0500
- References: <OE65oDk9X2VFyBUMeEk0000ecac@hotmail.com> <01fe01c16916$a920a350$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <3BEBC8F6.3B150BA3@yahoo.com> <021401c16976$7a591380$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <3BEFCB8E.C0507FBD@yahoo.com> <02c901c16bca$1a7e5fa0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> <20011112224913.GA25415@redhat.com> <VA.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20011113021832.GB26569@redhat.com> <001501c16bea$26d495b0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot Com
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 01:23:14PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <email@example.com>
>> Here's a really radical idea -- how about throwing out all of the
>> specific stuff and the .rc file and going with something like fltk
>> ( http://www.fltk.org/ ) instead?
>I'll consider patches, but have no intention of doing this myself at
>The .rc editor I've done work on, sitting in the cygwin-apps cvs
>repository (ah, if only I had time) uses fltk IIRC. It's quite nice.
>IMO our problem is our internal object model, not the toolkit. I'd
>rather get things tidied up one by one, and then reevaluate whats left,
>than change toolkits and hope...
I thought it would be sufficiently hard to implement drop down boxes
with the current scheme that possibly a new approach would make sense.
I'll confess that I've never done drop-downs before. Maybe they're