This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Robots binary package


Your reference doesn't say that _ALL_ packages need a README.  What's
difficult with Robots?  Your reference also doesn't say anything about
adding how the package was configured to a README.  Your reference was
only dealing with where to put the READMEs that need to be created.  I
don't see a need for a README for all packages.  I don't see a need for
a README for Robots.

Earnie.

Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> The configure flags for the package perhaps. I thought that having
> /usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-readme was standard for binary packages - see this
> thread (Started by you :])
> 
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-06/msg00021.html
> 
> Rob
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen@redhat.com>
> To: <cygwin-apps@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Robots binary package
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:56:19PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > Is missing /usr/doc/Cygwin/Robots-2.0.1.README.
> > >
> > > Is that intentional?
> >
> > Yes.  What do you want to read?
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> > --
> > Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin
> to
> > Cygwin Developer
> mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> >

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]