This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ITP: Guile 1.5.6
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Ok. But (nitpick) shouldn't those be in either libintlX, or in
gettext-devel? I didn't imagine they would be in gettext, so I didn't
even look there...
Yes, ordinarily you would be correct (just like you were earlier today
vis a vis netpbm <g>). However, the gettext package was split up in a
weird way, based on suggestions from Bruno Haible, the "real" GNU
He specifically stated that:
Contents: Runtime libraries and programs.
Audience: Anyone who wants to run internationalized programs.
Contents: Tools and documentation for developers and translators.
Audience: Anyone who wants to develop or localize internationalized
programs, i.e. developers and translators.
Dependencies: requires gettext.
Everything else, i.e. currently:
Unfortunately, we aren't linux -- so we must separate the runtime
libraries from the binaries. Hence,
libintl2 (runtime libs)
except that since 'gettext-tools' contained "development" tools, so I
renamed it 'gettext-devel'. Perhaps that was misguided.
However, the important point here is that Bruno **specifically** stated
that the link libraries should go in the gettext package. Without an
overriding reason to violate that 'suggestion', I went ahead with it.
Sorry for the confusion. :-)