This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ITP] FreeCiv 1.12.0 for X

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:03:23AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:23:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>> > Yes, you really should be subscribed to the XFree86 mailing list if you 
>> > are ITP'ing a package for X.  However, since ghostscript was a switch 
>> > hitter, apparently it was ok for it to get approved here.  I believe 
>> > Freeciv has an ncurses version, so I'm not real sure what the protocol 
>> > would be on this.  Should do an ITP on cygwin-xfree as well?
>> If there are two binaries (and X version and a separate ncurses version) 
>> that can each be installed independently of the other -- with perhaps a 
>> third "common" package that each depends on -- then I'd probably 
>> two-track it.  Post to both cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree.
>> Or, release it in stages: first the non-X version, thru cygwin-apps. 
>> Then later the X- version, which should probably be discussed on both 
>> cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree.  (Yeah, ghostscript-X should've been cc:ed 
>> to cygwin-xfree, probably).
>I'll go ahead and resend the Ghostscript 7.05-1 announcement to
>cygwin-xfree; I'm sure the XFree86 users would like to know about
>it too.

Actually (maybe you mean this) but you probably should send it to


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]