This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] FreeCiv 1.12.0 for X
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:03:23AM -0700, Dario Alcocer wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:23:57AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>> > Yes, you really should be subscribed to the XFree86 mailing list if you
>> > are ITP'ing a package for X. However, since ghostscript was a switch
>> > hitter, apparently it was ok for it to get approved here. I believe
>> > Freeciv has an ncurses version, so I'm not real sure what the protocol
>> > would be on this. Should do an ITP on cygwin-xfree as well?
>> If there are two binaries (and X version and a separate ncurses version)
>> that can each be installed independently of the other -- with perhaps a
>> third "common" package that each depends on -- then I'd probably
>> two-track it. Post to both cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree.
>> Or, release it in stages: first the non-X version, thru cygwin-apps.
>> Then later the X- version, which should probably be discussed on both
>> cygwin-apps and cygwin-xfree. (Yeah, ghostscript-X should've been cc:ed
>> to cygwin-xfree, probably).
>I'll go ahead and resend the Ghostscript 7.05-1 announcement to
>cygwin-xfree; I'm sure the XFree86 users would like to know about
Actually (maybe you mean this) but you probably should send it to