Re: xerces-c, xerces-c-devel, xerces-c-doc 2.1.0-2 available forreview/upload

[Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov at gmx dot net>]

On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:

> Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
> version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the
> testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays as -3 when
> uploading. Likewise, updating -1 to -2 to -3 during the review process
> allows the testers to update properly. Does that make sense?

Ok, but if one releases a new Cygwin package shouldn't it get -1, which
will make it first Cygwin release of this package ? And I'm under the
impression that xerces is a new package :)