Re: Trivial ChangeLog amendment for setup-200206 branch

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:12:21PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>I was just working on extracting the correct changelog entries for the
>release notes for the upcoming setup release, when I discovered an
>accidental deletion of an entry.
>
>OK to apply this to the 2.249 branch?

I think that ChangeLog entries about ChangeLog entries are rather redundant.
Since a ChangeLog is documentation, I don't see any reason to be self-referential.

cgf

>Index: ChangeLog
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /home/max/cvsmirror/cygwin-apps-cvs/setup/ChangeLog,v
>retrieving revision 2.249.2.10
>diff -u -p -u -r2.249.2.10 ChangeLog
>--- ChangeLog 7 Mar 2003 22:23:52 -0000 2.249.2.10
>+++ ChangeLog 20 Mar 2003 20:10:00 -0000
>@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
>+2003-03-20  Max Bowsher  <maxb at ukf dot net>
>+
>+ * ChangeLog: Reinstate ChangeLog entry erroneously removed in revision
>+ 2.249.2.1 .
>+
> 2003-03-05  Max Bowsher  <maxb at ukf dot net>
>
>  * netio.cc (save_dialog): Allocate an empty string if the password is
>@@ -65,7 +70,12 @@
> 2002-06-05  Robert Collins  <rbtcollins at hotmail dot com>
>
>  * Branch for a new release.
>-
>+
>+2002-05-26  Ralf Habacker  <ralf dot habacker at freenet dot de>
>+
>+ * archive_tar.cc (archive_tar::next_file_name()): fixed broken
>+ GNU long name extension support.
>+
> 2002-05-27  Robert Collins  <rbtcollins at hotmail dot com>
>
>  * IniParseFindVisitor.cc (IniParseFindVisitor::visitFile): Don't