RE: [PATCH] Bigger Chooser Part 3 In Super 3-D: RECTPP

[Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>]

On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 13:40, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 13:01, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> 
> > And that adaptation is not in a manner analagous to that happening in e.g.
> > HANDLEWrapper*.  xxWrapper are full-blown, honest-to-God classes, with
> > destructors and everything, and are not inherited from structs.  Virtual
> > functions could be added, one could go nuts, no problems.  Not so with RECTPP.
> > 
> > And the name "RECTPP" certainly brought to your attention that *something*
> > unusual was up, and thus served the very purpose you've claimed on several
> > occaisions it doesn't.
> 
> I never claimed that RECTPP did not bring it to my attention. I said
> that RECTPP is not evocative of your intended use.

Oh, just thinking, one name comes to mind that you might like, and that
will evoke the right idea:
Setup::RECT.

I.E. Put the class in namespace Setup. Then inherit from ::RECT.

The comment on virtual use etc near the class defn.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part