This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: New Bash ready for upload
Sorry for the late reply - I just became a father last monday night :)
Anyway, -15 is prev, -13 can be removed. The difference between -13 and -15 is
that the canonical patches released between -13 and -15 are applied to -15,
and there's been a maintainer and packaging method change, but I don't think
any of those changes will want people to keep -13 rather than -15.
I'll send an announcement shortly.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:58:22PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2003-10-20T15:22+0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> ) I've applied cgf's patch to Bash and test-driven it on my machine. The new
> ) version is available here:
> ) e148fb06b6c856a591a985d86361da15 *bash-2.05b-16-src.tar.bz2
> ) http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/release/bash/bash-2.05b-16-src.tar.bz2
> ) 837f987c5c5cbceb773bf14a32060bac *bash-2.05b-16.tar.bz2
> ) http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/release/bash/bash-2.05b-16.tar.bz2
> Uploaded. Please send an announcement once you have had a chance to verify
> correct installation with setup.exe.
> Should I remove 2.05b-13? Corinna asked earlier (I was waiting for a reply
> before pushing) which is why I am unsure. There are no overrides in
> setup.hint, so everyone should be running 2.05b-15 at present, and should
> automatically upgrade to 2.05b-16 the next time setup is run.
> Thanks for the update,
> Daniel Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/
> "A professor is one who talks in someone else's sleep."
Code like that would not pass through anybody's yuck-o-meter.
- Linus Torvalds about design on linux-kernel