This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Max Bowsher wrote:
+ name="RedHat.Cygwin.Setup"
... perhaps just "Cygwin.Setup" here ?
To be honest I have no idea, but was going by what the SDK says. About 'name' it says: "Uniquely names the application or assembly. Use the following format for the name: Organization.Division.Name. For example Microsoft.Windows.mysampleApp. Required."
Then perhaps "Cygwin.Setup.Setup" ?
*shrug* I guess I don't get what's wrong with using RedHat.
The resources that get compiled into the DLL use "Red Hat" for "CompanyName" and "Cygwin" for "ProductName". They own the copyright on the DLL code and probably a good chunk of the setup code, not to mention the trademark. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |