This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] librsvg2
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>> and the /usr/share/doc/librsvg2/* should go into a new package
>> "librsvg2-doc" along with all of the html/* files from librsvg2-devel.
> The docs in $pkgdocdir are the standard COPYING/NEWS/README docs that
> all users should receive,
Well, IMO it should be their option whether they want to dl/install the
licensing and docu along with the actual DLL (which may be /required/ in
order to use some application). By packaging them in a single tarball,
the user doesn't get that option; it's all or nothing.
But this isn't policy; it's just my opinion.
> but the html docs in librsvg2-devel are
> gtk-doc API documentation that would only be of interest to developers
> and packagers.
>> Otherwise, rebuilds fine from source and passes its builtin testsuite.
As does the -2 version. GTG.