This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] mutt-1.5.21-1
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri at yahoo dot it>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com, Andy Koppe <andy dot koppe at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:27:51 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: [ITP] mutt-1.5.21-1
--- Sab 13/11/10, Andy Koppe ha scritto:
> On 12 November 2010 13:09, Marco
> Atzeri wrote:
> > The Mutt E-Mail Client
> > "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less."
> > -the author, circa 1995
> > The package is present in all distributions.
> > This package depends on "libslang2" still in ITP
> I'm wondering, does it make a difference to users whether
> it's built
> for slang or ncurses?
as mutt is already available and this ITP is clearly wrong,
your question is purely academic. ;-)
I built with s-lang as I was building slrn that need slang,
and I wrongly thought we were missing mutt for the same reason.
I am not sure about the answer to your question;
on debian they built against ncursesw
while on archlinux they build with s-lang for this
My version of s-lang is built with Onigurama so
it should work also with Japanese like languages,
but I am afraid is just mine guess and I could be