This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] slang-2.2.2
- From: Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri at yahoo dot it>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:45:36 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: [ITP] slang-2.2.2
--- Lun 15/11/10, Reini Urban ha scritto:
> 2010/11/15 Reini Urban :
> > 2010/11/15 Marco Atzeri:
> >> --- Lun 15/11/10, Andy Koppe ?ha scritto:
> >>> Sorry, one more issue: I think slsh should go
> into the
> >>> 'Interpreters'
> >>> category rather 'Libs', alongside the other
> >>> languages.
> >>> Otherwise, GTG. Thanks very much for packaging
> >> right. amended and uploaded again.
> > I also had a look just now.
> > Just a hint for the next update.
> > Normally with such libraries the docs are put into the
> base package.
> > You have it in the libslang-devel package.
As the documentation is only useful for the development,
I think it is better in this way, and I see that also other
packages are built in the same way.
A base package with only documentation seems wrong to me.
> Another minor pick, not that important.
> % Add local additions here
> It tries to load local-packages from
> but this dir does not exist.
> Can you add an empty file here, so that it will be
cygport is too smart in this case
Removing empty directory: /usr/share/slsh/local-packages
I will take note for the next repackage
> Reini Urban