This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: TeX Live transition complete
- From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 14:00:53 -0600
- Subject: Re: TeX Live transition complete
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of firstname.lastname@example.org designates 10.50.179.3 as permitted sender) email@example.com; dkim=pass firstname.lastname@example.org
- References: <1330664688.6952.24.camel@YAAKOV04> <4F539AB9.email@example.com>
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 11:39 -0500, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/2/2012 12:04 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> > If you have any more questions about TeX Live, please let me know.
> Just one small question for now. I found that asymptote didn't build
> from source for me:
> g++ -Wall -ansi -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> -I/usr/include/tirpc -g -O2 -pipe --no-var-tracking -I .
> -I/usr/include/tirpc -o runsystem.o -c runsystem.cc
> runfile.in: In function âvoid run::gen_runfile47(vm::stack*)â:
> runfile.in:353:19: error: âmkstempâ was not declared in this scope
> Makefile:307: recipe for target `runfile.o' failed
> After reverting your patch to runfile.in (i.e., restoring the
> declaration of mkstemp), the build succeeded. Could my build
> environment be different from yours so that I need that declaration but
> you don't? I'm using Cygwin's gcc4-g++-4.5.3-3.
I've been working on improving the feature test macros which control
which symbols are exposed by the headers. You can just revert that
section of the patch in the meantime.