This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:27:14 +0200
- Subject: Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- References: <515B3D7B dot 5000704 at lysator dot liu dot se> <515B4494 dot 4000704 at gmail dot com> <515BD5EF dot 40709 at lysator dot liu dot se> <515BF7DA dot 2000607 at gmail dot com> <515EA47C dot 8080809 at lysator dot liu dot se>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Apr 5 12:16, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 11:35, marco atzeri wrote:
> > On 4/3/2013 9:10 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> On 2013-04-02 22:50, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>> On 4/2/2013 10:20 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>>> gii=1.0.2-3
> >>>> ggi=2.2.2-3
> >>>> misc=2.2.2-3
> >>>> wmh=0.3.2-3
> >>
> >>> done.
> >>> I put all in a libggi main directory like 32bit one
> >>
> >> Thanks, but the packages do not show up in setup (the files are there, but
> >> setup64.ini is incomplete). Did you remember to run GEN-sware? Or is some
> >> extra tweak needed when an extra directory level is added?
> >
> > forgot. I just run it now
>
> And I should have checked my script one more time. Since I forgot a trailing
> slash in the base url, it picked up the 32bit packages. I really should have
> figured out that something was strange because I didn't have to edit the
> number of dir levels to cut. Sigh. But given that noone has noticed, that
> nothing in the 64bit dist depends on the ggi libs yet, and the general beta
> state of everything it's perhaps safe to simply replace the tarballs? Or
> should I reroll -4?
>
> Anyway, below I intended the first time in case that's enough...
No worries. Uploaded and 32 bit version removed.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
- References:
- [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3
- Re: [64bit RFU] libgii 1.0.2-3, libggi 2.2.2-3, libggimisc 2.2.2-3 and libggiwmh 0.3.2-3