This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: perl-5.18.2-1
- From: David Stacey <drstacey at tiscali dot co dot uk>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 23:00:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: perl-5.18.2-1
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <534078A2 dot 4000601 at tiscali dot co dot uk> <87bnwf2cjl dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <534174C4 dot 5010608 at tiscali dot co dot uk> <87y4zi1kib dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5341A3F5 dot 2040506 at tiscali dot co dot uk> <CAHiT=DF117Jf0jdV8KQHOakkOw3_A5FvmSRKRRVnXGt-MLY6cA at mail dot gmail dot com> <8761mlx7im dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <CAHiT=DFhajOOFDeFseptmrPVXHGVjrAiFxDaW6Z7qQ6XR070DQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87a9bvsnse dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <CAHiT=DEe1O4Vn7dp2mPwUNvEagZDtauu9_ZS1vfpEgZ+V0wt4A at mail dot gmail dot com> <8761loegk8 dot fsf_-_ at Rainer dot invalid> <87fvkq57do dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <87y4y8uoe2 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <87k369lc8v dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1408137347 dot 1564 dot 19 dot camel at YAAKOV04>
On 15/08/14 22:15, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Where did we leave off wrt breaking out
perl_vendor?
Back in April, Reini expressed a desire to keep perl_vendor, claiming
that it is the easiest solution for both user and maintainer [1].
Whilst there are some of us who might question this, Reini has vastly
more knowledge and experience of perl than I ever will have. So when
Reini states that there are good reasons why perl_vendor should stay, I
am prepared to respect his judgement.
As our perl maintainer wishes to keep perl_vendor, any discussion to the
contrary seems somewhat academic.
Dave.
[1] https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-04/msg00015.html