This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Question about clisp version naming
- From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko at nexgo dot de>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:46:41 +0100
- Subject: Re: Question about clisp version naming
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5500B536 dot 4050108 at cornell dot edu> <1426112433 dot 11504 dot 18 dot camel at cygwin dot com> <874mpq4sxr dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5503122C dot 9000601 at cornell dot edu> <871tkshf53 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1426275761 dot 16148 dot 19 dot camel at cygwin dot com> <87fv98fyef dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1426280879 dot 16148 dot 29 dot camel at cygwin dot com>
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> Obviously we don't have %dist, but did you continue reading to the
> "Non-Numeric Version in Release" section?
Yes. I can somewhat understand the rationale for putting this in the
release part, but I still like the openSUSE numbering better. The
central question is how you introduce ordering and it's easily taken
care of by prepending the ISO data before any version monikers that
don't strictly increment. We've got a bunch of those already in Cygwin
as well (most of them from Jari IIRC), so why should we change that now?
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada