This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Naming convention for versioned libraries
On 6/12/2017 1:15 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2017-06-11 13:13, Ken Brown wrote:
I'm about to ITP geomview, which will include a library package
containing DLLs of the form cyg*-1-9-5.dll. Should the package be
called libgeomview1_9_5 or libgeomview_1_9_5? I see both conventions
in the distro.
But, is this really a standalone library that can be used without
geomview, or is it just a support library intended for geomview and any
of its plugins? If the latter, then there should just be geomview and
I think it's just a support library. I just sent the ITP a little while
ago, but I'll repackage with geomview and geomview-devel and send it again.