Re: setup issues

[Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd at yahoo dot com>]

--- DJ Delorie <dj@delorie.com> wrote:
> 
> That won't work if we store multiple versions, which I think we should
> allow for.  Better, a separate subdir of symbolic links of "everything
> you need", that setup either uses or knows to ignore.
> 

I like this option.  The symbolic link then would need to be updated with the
most current stable version.

> > Then, when someone has a problem we just have to tell them to download
> > setup.exe and all of the above files and then run setup.
> 
> The behemoth setup.exe (full.exe?) is a better idea.  We just have to
> automate building it (a setup.exe option? ;)

Maybe.  I've real mixed feelings on this.  Hmm... full.exe could be a
"self-extracting" zip file.  Then the use would execute full followed by an
execution of setup.  Uhm, rather than full.exe how about user-tools and
dev-tools.  I've always thought that the full, and user-tools was confusing. 
With user-tools and dev-tools you'ld have to get both to have the whole
shebang.

Cheers,

=====
---
   Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
            __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
Cygwin Newbies: <http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html>
           __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
  Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
    Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/