This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: -lc and -lm
- To: cygwin developers <cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: -lc and -lm
- From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall at rfk dot com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:58:30 -0400
At 08:35 AM 9/8/2000, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Back in B18 when I started using Cygwin these libraries were stub libraries.
>Is there a reason that they shouldn't be stub libraries instead of symlinks to
>cygwin runtime?
>
>Cheers,
>
>=====
>--- <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com> ---
> Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
> __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
>Cygwin Newbies: <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/>
> __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
> Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
> Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>
Good question. I remember a discussion on the topic of exactly what form
these libraries should take in Cygwin back a long time ago. I believe it
was Mumit who suggested that these libraries could (and should) be symlinks
(I may not be remembering this correctly.) Anyway, its my impression that
having libm.a and libc.a be symlinks to libcygwin.a is sufficiently
problematic that it makes sense to explore other options.
There. Now that we have my opinion, someone can go ahead and fix the
problem!;-)
Larry Hall lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX