This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
winsup/doc layout change?
- To: "Cygwin Developers List" <cygwin-developers at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: winsup/doc layout change?
- From: "edward" <tailbert at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:40:21 -0500
Hi CygPeepers,
(1) LAYOUT CHANGE
I've been looking at the ~winsup/doc directory and I would like to propose
the following layout change:
~winsup/doc/
[some common files here, e.g. README, AUTHORS, etc.]
cygwin-api/
cygwin-api-int/
cygwin-ug/
cygwin-ug-net/
doctool/ <- source for doctool.exe
faq/
sgml/ <- sgml sources
texinfo/ <- texinfo sources
text/ <- random text files until we have real docs
utils/ <- sgml files for the apps in utils
The basic premise is to have subdirectories which contain major pieces of
documentation, like the cygwin-api and cygwin-ug (user guide). Each
directory should contain pretty much all you need for that given document.
The names I've used above are mostly to demonstrate the concept.
I'm fairly indifferent to the names as long as it makes sense.
(2) DOCUMENT SOURCE LANGUAGE
Right now, the documentation varies from simple text, to sgml to texinfo. I
propose we stick with one. DocBook 3.0 is what most of the current documents
use, so it's probably just easiest to go entirely to that.
Once we do that, we can get rid of some of the directories in the layout
above, like texinfo, and text.
(3) AUTOCONF/AUTOMAKE
Any objections to using autoconf/automake in the doc directory?
Specifically, the released versions of automake/autoconf.
When a decision is made about the previous points, I'd like to start working
(4) UTILS MANPAGES
on man pages for the winsup/cygwin/utils apps next.
Cheers,
edward
OH. PS. I've already done (1) - (3) in some form. Just needs to be fine
tuned to whatever is decided.