This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: crash on latest cygwin snapshot


On 03/07/2012 4:05 AM, marco atzeri wrote:
On 7/2/2012 6:01 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[redirecting to cygwin-developers]
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:43:06PM +0200, marco atzeri wrote:
On 6/27/2012 3:46 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:

Sorry, Marco. Nevermind. I duplicated this. No need to upload anything.
I'm still working on it.

it seems solved on 20120702 snapshots

Thanks for confirming. I suspect that this snapshot really only masks the
problem. The stack was getting corrupted by something but I was having a
really hard time figuring out what was doing it.


Compiling path.cc without optimization or passwd.cc without
-fomit-frame-pointer "fixed" the problem but clearly something is wrong.

I tried building Cygwin with stack probes and that made the DLL
unrunnable.  I tried instrumenting it with -finstrument-functions and
that made the problem go away.

The problem is that something, somewhere along the line, replaces a
frame pointer in the stack with 0x10c (268) and the return address with
zero.  So, eventually, when a function returns, %ebp is set to 0x10c and
the program jumps to address zero.  That is one manifestation. In others
the 0x10c is still there but it is interpreted as a pointer to something
and dereferencing it causes a SEGV.

0x10c is 256 + 12 but I haven't been able to find that anywhere in the
source.

Your test triggered a problem which has existed in Cygwin since last November.
I noticed it in snapshots going back to 2012-11-14. But, when I tried to
build a version of Cygwin from before that time, it still manifested the
problem. I did change to gcc 4.5.3 around that time so I'm thinking that
either this version of gcc exposed a problem in Cygwin or Cygwin has exposed
a problem in this version gcc. There was an odd problem in select() where
it seemed like constructors weren't being properly run on a local variable
when alloca was used in the same function.


cgf


gcc-4.5 has some issue on windows platform (cygwin and mingw) for wrong optimization of function return value on C++ code.
I have also had issues with 4.5 (4.5.3 in particular) on Linux, where destructors failed to run properly in optimized code. I now make a point of upgrading (or self-compiling) to at least 4.6; I've actually had no problems yet with 4.7 after using it for some months under both cygwin and linux, though I haven't tried compiling a cygwin dll with it yet.

Ryan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]